i warmed up another muffin in the microwave and made some decaf hazelnut coffee. i had a bathroom break afterwards; it's definitely the coffee and not the caffeine that makes me go to the bathroom. today was another good spring day, similar to yesterday, intermittent sun, not as warm, though still in the 60's.
my father sent me photos of his 150A meter setup. the meter arrived yesterday in the mail, and if i only checked the mailbox before i left, i would've seen it. unfortunately there are no attachment points on the meter, so my father just tied it to a board with wires.
i moved some of my houseplants outside: the money plant (Pachira aquatica), christmas cactus, aloe, and jade plant. i'm not going to bother moving them indoors even though the temperature will dip into the low 40's tonight. the greatest danger probably isn't the temperature but rather squirrels looking for food and uprooting the plants.

i then went to belmont. i brought in all the garden refuse bins. i set up the webcam so it was pointing directly on the watt meter so we can see the status of the 100W solar panel online. the highest i saw it go up was only 50W though. i left 4 pieces of fried chicken for my father. i took the plastic dish washing cart so i could use it to transport some plants i will dig up from my community garden. before i left the neighbor's contractors dug up a patch of our sidewalk grass to do some cable wiring.

around 4pm i went down to harvard for a panel discussion marking the 30th anniversary of the tiananmen massacre. it was held at the CGIS south tsai auditorium, which i don't remember ever visiting before. it was a packed crowd, 
rowena he was the moderator, a soft-spoken woman who talked so quietly at first i could barely hear her until they increased the volume on the microphone. as for the speakers, there was wang dan, one of the tiananmen leaders, now living in exile; louisa lim, jeffrey wasserstrom, and hao jian, a beijing film academy professor currently a harvard visiting scholar who has never publicly spoken about his first hand experience of the massacre but was doing so publicly for the first time (what will happen to him when he returns to china is up for debate). of the panel, the native english speakers had better presentation only because they were up against the challenge of using a second language. but wang dan and hao jian were in tiananmen in 1989, so whatever they said had more gravity.
during the Q&A portion, a few questions showed how little the newer chinese generation know of the tiananmen massacre. one person brought up the unofficial body count almost to dispute the number of deaths. hao jian - speaking now in chinese with a translator - told his own eyewitness account of seeing a friend shot in front of him, of piles of bodies with bullet holes on trucks, and visiting nearly a dozen beijing hospitals to find the body of cousin and seeing all the dead bodies in the morgue with traumatic injuries, nearly 40-50. another person asked if it wasn't true that china would've been better off without the protest, and that the protest actually drove the regime to become more conservative. the panel were all in agreement that the government had already turned hardline years before, and that the protest was in reaction to that, not the cause of.
there were also some good questions, one girl asked for about the welfare of hao jian, asked what would happen to him when he returned to beijing. he said he didn't know, but was touched she was concerned about his safety. another person asked if the panel could see another tiananmen-style protest happening in the future. at first everyone sort of laughed it of given how china has increasing become a surveillance state, and the young generation worry more about getting a job, buying a house, and getting married ("there's no future in politics"). but wang dan said something profound, that during his time teaching in taiwan, he noticed the first thing many mainland students do when they leave the great firewall of china is to look up all the taboo subjects they can't see easily back home. wang dan said never under-estimate the curiosity of young people.
i biked home after 6pm. i checked my e-mail and was surprised that kevin actually kept his promise and wrote back. he said he'd try to schedule us for either friday or monday, and would get back to me again tomorrow (thursday). sounds promising, but that's what he said two weeks ago and nothing happened, so i'm a bit leery until i can get something more concrete.
for dinner i had more fried chicken (breast and drumstick) and some more sweet navel oranges. the bruins-hurricanes game isn't until tomorrow; tonight it's just the red sox and the celtics. celtics are down 1-3 against the bucks, after beating milwaukee so soundly in game 1, boston has since imploded, with no help from all-star kyrie irving, whom many expect to opt out of his final year contract and go elsewhere. red sox have their final game against the baltimore orioles. it's sad seeing so many empty seats, a perfectly good baseball stadium going to waste because not enough fans and a last place team in the AL east division. the game went into extra innings, finally ending in the 12th thanks to a benintendi homerun. with the win the red sox are finally a .500 team, 3rd in the AL east, 2 games behind the yankees, 4 games behind the rays.
2 pieces of fried chicken wasn't enough and i ended up eating a piece of thigh as well a bit later while watching the season finale of single parents followed by whiskey cavalier.

